In the screaming world of cable news and the over-hyped release of any new creative work, hostile debates about everything from politics to fashion are pushed to the extreme. And, for as much of a pop culture fan as I am, I do my best to not participate in raising the volume of the already noxious noise.
But when I hear religious fundamentalists argue with atheists, that noise gets my attention, at least for a second, because I wonder why they are arguing and what a win would look like. Why would a fundamentalist of any stripe accept the challenge that there must be a final and scientific proof of G*d? And why would an atheist be so fundamentally dogmatic in proving that G*d doesn't exist?
I need the exact same proof for the existence of G*d that I need for the existence of love or happiness, and that is simply this: experience. I have the full measure of my own experience that tells me everything I need to know.
I'm not asking science to concur, or religion to explain, any more than I would ask them to verify that the love I know is real. I don't need an expert to tell me the laughter I share with friends is proof of happiness. I already know it.
I know G*d can seem abstract and philosophical and literary and all sorts of other human constructs. Just like all the great poetry and prose and psychological analysis about love. But the essential experience of that divine presence is all the proof I will ever need.
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Very well said! I tend to feel that fundamentalists (and I would include the rabid variety of atheists here) are too anchored in fear to rely on mere experience. I love science, but not everything can be measured, at least not at this point in time, probably not ever. And there is no need for you or anyone else to agree with me for me to know something is my own truth. There is room on this planet for many truths!
By the way, where are your flags?
Post a Comment